Variants and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of Knee Injuries

Hsien Khai Tan; Mohammad M. Bakri; Wilfred C.G. Peh

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1365834

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Table of Contents

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014; 18(01): 045-053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365834

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Variants and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of Knee Injuries

Hsien Khai Tan

¹Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Alexandra Health, Singapore

,

Mohammad M. Bakri

²Department of Radiology, Kajang Hospital, Kajang, Malaysia

,

Wilfred C.G. Peh

¹Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Alexandra Health, Singapore

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

MR imaging is an established tool for the detection and diagnosis of various injuries and internal derangements of the knee, enabling excellent anatomical visualization and producing good soft tissue contrast and characterization. However, numerous normal variants and potential pitfalls may lead to diagnostic errors. Understanding the basic MR imaging principles, applying the correct technique, knowing the normal anatomy and variants, recognizing artifacts, and assuring good clinical and radiographic correlation helps avoid these potential pitfalls.

Keywords

diagnostic errors - knee normal variants - knee pseudolesions - MR imaging pitfalls

Full Text

References

References
1 Mesgarzadeh M, Moyer R, Leder DS , et al. MR imaging of the knee: expanded classification and pitfalls to interpretation of meniscal tears. Radiographics 1993; 13 (3) 489-500
2 Roychowdhury S, Fitzgerald SW, Sonin AH, Peduto AJ, Miller FH, Hoff FL. Using MR imaging to diagnose partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of axial images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (6) 1487-1491
3 Peh WCG, Chan JHM. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (4) 179-191
4 Ramnath RR, Magee T, Wasudev N, Murrah R. Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (1) 221-225
5 Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (2) 371-375
6 Helms CA. The meniscus: recent advances in MR imaging of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179 (5) 1115-1122
7 Escobedo EM, Hunter JC, Zink-Brody GC, Wilson AJ, Harrison SD, Fisher DJ. Usefulness of turbo spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: comparison with a conventional spin-echo sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (5) 1223-1227
8 Cheung LP, Li KCP, Hollett MD, Bergman AG, Herfkens RJ. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of detection with fast spin-echo MR imaging and arthroscopic correlation in 293 patients. Radiology 1997; 203 (2) 508-512
9 Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G , et al. Fat suppression in MR imaging: technique and pitfalls. Radiographics 1999; 19: 373-382
10 Disler DG, Peters TL, Muscoreil SJ , et al. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (4) 887-892
11 Peh WCG, Chan JHM. The magic angle phenomenon in tendons: effect of varying the MR echo time. Br J Radiol 1998; 71 (841) 31-36
12 Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS, Carrera GF, Strandt JA, Estkowski LD. Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the “magic angle” phenomenon. Radiology 1991; 181 (2) 389-392
13 Snoeckx A, Vanhoenacker FM, Gielen JL, Van Dyck P, Parizel PM. Magnetic resonance imaging of variants of the knee. Singapore Med J 2008; 49 (9) 734-744
14 Watanabe AT, Carter BC, Teitelbaum GP, Seeger LL, Bradley Jr WG. Normal variations in MR imaging of the knee: appearance and frequency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153 (2) 341-344
15 Shankman S, Beltran J, Melamed E, Rosenberg ZS. Anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: another potential pitfall in MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 1997; 204 (1) 181-184
16 Andrews CL. From the RSNA Refresher Courses. Radiological Society of North America. Evaluation of the marrow space in the adult hip. Radiographics 2000; 20 (Spec No): S27-S42
17 Arndt III WF, Truax AL, Barnett FM, Simmons GE, Brown DC. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (1) 119-124
18 Bredella MA, Stoller DW. Marrow imaging. In: Stoller DW, , ed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopedics and Sport Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 1978-1982
19 Moore SG, Dawson KL. Red and yellow marrow in the femur: age-related changes in appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 175 (1) 219-223
20 Peh WCG. Modern imaging of the musculoskeletal system: is there still a role for radiography?. Singapore Med J 2002; 43 (8) 385-386